AI search°

Being the answer, and being able to prove it

Generative engine optimisation, answer engine optimisation, LLM SEO, AI visibility. The labels vary; the work is getting cited and accurately described when an assistant answers a question about your category. We work across four layers: the assistants, Google's AI Search surfaces, the off-site sources that carry most of the citations, and the measurement that makes any of it accountable.

New to the vocabulary? What is generative engine optimisation, what is answer engine optimisation and GEO vs AEO vs SEO answer the terms before the offer.

A growth leader reviewing AI search visibility for a SaaS brand
Start here

Most of your citations will never come from your own site

An analysis of 5.7 million citation links across B2B SaaS prompts found the ten most-cited domains account for 35%+ of all citations. Reddit is first, G2 second. Eight of the ten are domains a SaaS vendor does not own.

Almost every AI search offer in the market sells schema, entity work and content restructuring. That work is necessary and it addresses the minority of citations. The coordinated programme for the sources that actually get cited is harder, slower and needs senior judgement, which is why few people sell it and why we lead with it.

So the honest version of this offer is: on-site work alone will not deliver the outcome. If that is all you want, there are cheaper places to buy it.

Source: Goodie, The Most Cited B2B SaaS Domains in AI Search. 5.7 million citation links analysed across B2B SaaS prompts.

Coverage

Every assistant, and what we cover

Including the two we have deliberately chosen not to write pages about. A stated exclusion is a judgement. An unstated one is an oversight.

AssistantUS shareOur coverage
ChatGPT
51.3%
Dedicated page
Google Gemini
27.7%
Dedicated page
Claude
10.3%
Dedicated page
Grok
2.8%
Dedicated page
Perplexity
2%
Dedicated page
Microsoft Copilot
1.3%
Dedicated page
DeepSeek
0.4%
No page, deliberately. Under half a percent of US assistant usage and almost no SaaS buying activity. We monitor it and will publish a page if that changes.
Meta AI
0.1%
No page, deliberately. Consumer-social usage rather than software research. No SaaS buyer journeys observed in our monitoring.

Source: First Page Sage, Top Generative AI Chatbots by Market Share. July 2026, US monthly-active-user estimates.

Layer two

Google's Search surfaces

These are separated from the assistants on purpose. AI Overviews and AI Mode are surfaces inside Google Search, shown to somebody who is searching. The Gemini app is a separate product a buyer opens deliberately. Collapsing the two is what made Google look covered on this site while the single largest gap sat inside it.

Layer four

Measurement, as a service rather than a bullet

Measurement is the part our positioning already promises and the part competitors find hardest to copy, so it is a service line rather than a line item. We have published the definitions behind every number we report, including the ways each metric is usually inflated, so you can hold us to them.

  • A declared, frozen prompt set and competitor set, so the denominator cannot move
  • Each prompt run repeatedly, because model outputs are non-deterministic
  • Every platform reported separately, never blended into one score
  • Follow-up turns measured, because visibility usually collapses by turn three
  • Source concentration reported, so you can see which domains own your category
Your market

The rules are not the same in every market

What you can lawfully measure, what you can lawfully send, and how buying committees behave all differ by market, and they change the plan rather than decorating it. Each of these pages carries the specifics for its market.

Questions teams ask about AI search